Flamengo has a new trial in the match between Flamengo x Corinthians - understand why

Next Thursday (14), the Superior Court of Sports Justice (STJD) will judge those involved in the controversial confusion during the match between Flamengoand Corinthians for the Brazilian Championship. The episode involved players from both teams and resulted in serious allegations that will now be evaluated by the court. Among the defendants is Charly Alcaraz, a Flamengo athlete, accused of attacking a player from the São Paulo team. Alcaraz received a suspensive effect, which allows him to act until the day of the trial.

The match between Flamengo and Corinthians, valid for the Championship Brazilian, was marked by an environment of tension, which culminated in a series of disagreements between the players. The historic rivalry between the clubs and the pressure of the last games were decisive for the scenario that resulted in physical attacks. During the second half, an exchange of provocations evolved into aggression, which generated widespread confusion on the field and mobilized the referee to control the situation.

FLAMENGO HAS OPEN EYES ABOUT THE DECISION

In view of the episodes that occurred, the STJD took immediate action, opening an investigation into the incident. The court intends to assess the seriousness of the actions of each person involved and apply the penalties provided for in the Brazilian Code of Sports Justice (CBJD). In addition to conventional penalties, the STJD seeks to reinforce a stricter disciplinary stance, especially in cases involving physical aggression between athletes. Alcaraz's actions, for example, were highlighted as one of the critical points to be analyzed in the trial.

 Charly Alcaraz, Argentine player from Flamengo, it is one of the main people involved in the case, accused of attacking a Corinthians player during the match. Alcaraz was included in an article that deals with violent conduct, and his situation will be thoroughly evaluated by the STJD. So far, he has received a suspensive effect, which allows him to continue acting until the day of the trial. The player's defense argues that he acted in response to an opponent's provocation, but the images will be used as evidence to prove the version of events.

CAN ALCARAZ BE OUT?

Both Flamengo and Corinthians are eagerly awaiting the trial , as both can be impacted by possible punishments for their athletes. Flamengo is working to ensure that Alcaraz receives a minimum punishment, with the justification that the player was provoked and merely reacted. On the other hand, Corinthians seeks full accountability for Alcaraz, pointing out that the aggression came from the Flamengo athlete. The judgment at the STJD could result in suspensions that directly affect the formation of teams in the next rounds.