CONTROVERSIAL ARBITRATION IN THE CARIOCA SEMIFINAL GAME: FAILURES AND INCONSISTENCIES

The clash between Flamengo and Palmeiras in the semi-final of the Campeonato Carioca not only highlighted the talent on the field, but also sparked heated debates about refereeing. The controversy ranged from crucial moves to the use of the video referee (VAR), raising questions about the coherence and impartiality of the decisions. p>

During the match, a striking entry by Felipe Melo in the first half generated intense discussion. The aggressiveness of the move, which escaped punishment with a yellow card, led many to question the need for VAR intervention. For Bruno Spindel, executive director of Flamengo, the duality of criteria was evident:

"He had two criteria, and that doesn't fit into a semifinal game of a championship of the greatness of Carioca", he stated, expressing frustration with the apparent lack of consistency on the part of the refereeing. Another highlight was the penalty awarded after VAR analysis.

The justification given was a foul committed by Nico in Martinelli before the penalty. However, the discrepancy in the application of the rules, especially in moves involving players like Arrascaeta, brought to light the feeling of injustice and inequality.

The absence of cards in controversial plays, added to the excessive dependence on VAR in situations of extreme violence, it aroused criticism from both fans and the teams involved. For spectators and professionals linked to football, consistency and transparency in refereeing are fundamental to the integrity and credibility of the sport.

In view of the flaws and inconsistencies evidenced in the confrontation between Flamengo and Palmeiras, the need grows more careful analysis and review of protocols to ensure a fair and balanced game for all competing teams.