Arnaldo Cezar Coelho agreed with the penalty, but highlighted that the match referee could have stopped the game when the 2nd ball entered the field
|
0
With goals from Pedro and Gabigol, Flamengo beat Criciúma 2-1, securing the three points in a match full of emotions. The Rio team started behind on the scoreboard, but managed to turn things around, in a game that was marked for a very unusual reason and generated a lot of discussion.
The winning goal from Flamengo came from a penalty, but it was not a common infraction. At the end of the match, with the game tied at 1-1, midfielder Barreto, from Criciúma, kicked a second ball that was on the field towards the first, which was inside the area. Referee Maguielson Lima Barbosa did not hesitate in awarding the penalty to Mengão, considering the interference in the play.
As it was a rare move, several former refereeing professionals spoke out to clarify the situation. On his social networks, former referee and arbitration commentator Arnaldo Cezar Coelho explained that, despite being unusual, the penalty was correctly marked. "No one disputes that it was a penalty. Now, interpreting that a second ball inside the area would not interfere is childish," said Arnaldo.
However, Arnaldo Cezar Coelho highlighted that the referee could have stopped the play when the fans threw the second ball onto the field. "The play was still in the middle, it would give the referee time to stop the game. His inexperience, along with the defender's, in kicking the ball against each other," added Arnaldo, criticizing both the referee's lack of immediate action and the impulsive decision of the player from Criciúma.
Despite the controversy, the victory put Flamengo in a more comfortable position in the championship. The episode raised discussions about match management and the need for greater attention from referees in unexpected situations, which can significantly alter the outcome of a game.
The club turns on the alert
|
0
Carlinhos' performance in the last classic between Flamengoand Vasco, played on Sunday, has generated a wave of criticism and questions from the red and black fans. The striker, who entered the field in the 18th minute of the second half, replacing Bruno Henrique, played a discreet role and ended up failing to help the team in one of the most decisive moments of the match.
The classic, as always, was a game intense and highly anticipated by both fans, with great weight for the championship table and the morale of the teams. However, Carlinhos' entry, which lasted just 27 minutes, was considered below expectations, especially in a scenario where Flamengo was looking for a victory to distance itself from its rivals.
FLAMENGO HAS A DEFICIENCY IN THE CHAMPIONSHIP < /b>During the 27 minutes he was on the field, Carlinhos barely appeared, failing to influence the game as expected. The player only touched the ball a few times, did not create clear scoring chances and also did not help efficiently in the defensive system. With an apathetic performance, the striker ended up becoming a target of frustration for the fans, who expected more from a player who, at other times, had already demonstrated the potential to be decisive.
The lack of offensive participation was a of the main points raised by critics. In a game that required creativity and boldness to break through the Vasco blockade, Carlinhos was unable to find spaces or impose his presence as a constant threat to the opponent's goal. In classics, where every detail makes a difference, this lack of protagonism weighed even more.
The replacement of Bruno Henrique by Carlinhoswas also a factor that generated discussion. Bruno Henrique, although he was not having a brilliant performance, is a player recognized for his ability to decide games, especially in big confrontations. His departure 18 minutes into the second half was justified by the coaching staff as part of the planning to spare the athlete, who recently returned from injury.
The club goes to the market
|
0
After taking charge of Flamengo, Tite, former coach of the Brazilian national team, made it clear that he is quickly adapting to the club's culture. In recent statements, he highlighted Rubro-Negro's striking characteristic: the incessant search for all possible titles. According to the coach, this spirit of intense competition is something that he not only admires, but is also incorporating into his own work philosophy.
Tite, known for his meticulous and results-focused work, revealed that the Transition to Flamengo involves constant learning, especially in relation to the club's winning mentality. "Flamengo has this culture of fighting for every title. There is no focus on just one competition, the goal is to win everything within reach", he explained.
This characteristic is notable in Flamengoin recent years, which has won several important competitions, such as the Brazilian Championship and the Copa Libertadores. Tite, accustomed to pressure and the need for results, states that this mentality is something he is adopting in his day-to-day life at the club. “I see this culture, and this is what we are doing. Flamengo has this requirement, and I am a coach who likes this type of challenge.”
Although Tite has an established career, with successful spells at clubs such as Corinthians and the Brazilian national team, Flamengo represents a new experience for the coach. He is now at the helm of a team that has traditionally had fans calling for victories in every competition they compete in, something he sees as a positive challenge.
"You have to learn every day Even with the experience I have, here I realize that there are very high expectations, but at the same time that's what makes you grow", commented the coach. For him, working at a club that maintains such a high level of demand motivates him to always seek the best.
SUBSCRIBE NEWSLETTER
SUBSCRIBE NEWSLETTER
See previous
