WITH CHANGES, FLAMENGO IS SELECTED TO FACE AMAZONAS

Clubs interested in Gabriel Barbosa, Gabigol, have faced two crucial points in negotiations: the player's high salary and a trial for attempted fraud in an anti-doping test. These factors are shaping possible transactions involving the Flamengo striker. The financial issue is one of the biggest obstacles. Gabigol has a high salary, which naturally excludes several clubs from negotiations. This financial factor serves as a filter, limiting the number of teams that can bear the costs involved in signing the player. In addition to the financial issue, there is another significant challenge: Gabigol is involved in a trial for attempted fraud in an anti-doping test. This case has generated apprehension among interested clubs, who are paying attention to legal developments before moving forward in any negotiations.

FLAMENGO HAS A NEW DIRECTION IN NEGOTIATIONS

These two points - high salary and judgment - have a direct impact on the market. The clubs that still show interest in Gabigol need to carefully evaluate these factors to decide whether or not to move forward in negotiations. The financial situation is already a challenge in itself, and the legal uncertainty adds an extra level of complexity.

Some clubs are still interested in Gabigol, despite the challenges. They evaluate the potential return that the player can bring, both in terms of performance on the field and financial return through marketing and shirt sales. However, the combination of the high cost and the player's legal situation requires thorough analysis and careful risk management.

In an atmosphere of camaraderie, the Cruzeiro decided to carry out his training at Ninho do Urubu, Flamengo's training center, before continuing his trip to Santa Catarina. The decision to use Flamengo's facilities reinforces the good relationship between the two clubs, which remains strong and friendly.

Cruzeiro, after their last match, chose to remain in Rio de Janeiro to take advantage of the excellent conditions offered by the center Flamengo training. Ninho do Urubu is known for its cutting-edge structure, which provides an ideal environment for athletes to prepare in the best possible way for future challenges.

FLAMENGO OPENS THE DOORS OF CT 

The stay in Rio de Janeiro,< /a> in addition to being strategic in logistical terms, it allowed the Minas Gerais team to focus entirely on training, avoiding additional wear and tear with long and tiring trips. The decision to train at Flamengo's facilities is nothing new, as the good relationship between the clubs has already made this partnership possible on other occasions.

Preparation at Ninho do Urubu was also an opportunity for Cruzeiro's coach , adjust important details in the team before the next match. The infrastructure offered by Flamengo includes high quality fields, well-equipped weight rooms and an environment that favors the concentration of athletes.

The Brazilian Football Confederation (CBF) recently released the audio of the communication between the video refereeing team (VAR) and referee Ramon Abatti Abel, referring to a controversial move that occurred during the first half of the game, involving the attacker Pedro and the Amazonas goalkeeper. The decision not to award a penalty generated controversy among fans and sports commentators.

The episode happened when Pedro, shirt 9, advanced towards the goal and was intercepted by the opposing goalkeeper. In a tight contest, the goalkeeper apparently hit Pedro's leg. However, referee Ramon Abatti Abel decided not to award the foul, which caused immediate repercussions.

NOT THERE PENALTY IN PEDRO?
The VAR team, responsible for reviewing doubtful moves, analyzed the incident meticulously. In the published audio, it is possible to hear the communication between the video referees and the field referee. The analysis began with observing the moment the goalkeeper and Pedro collided. "The goalkeeper touches the ball first. The goalkeeper clearly touches the ball first. Go back," said one of the video referees. They requested different camera angles to ensure an accurate assessment. "Okay, the goalkeeper touches the ball, takes the ball away and then he has contact. Give me another angle."

The VAR team continued the review and reaffirmed that the goalkeeper's priority it was the ball. "Ball, ball, ball, and then there's contact due to the fight, for space, for the ball," they added. After this analysis, they concluded that the bid was normal. "Everything checked, normal," concluded the VAR referee.

< p>